| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
ACW representatives review wind project report
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Township Reeve Ben Van Diepenbeek believes council is satisfied with the Environmental Screening Report (ESR) for the Kingsbridge II Wind Power Project.
About 15 township residents and 15 representatives from EPCOR, including Paul McMillan, senior vice president of Ontario, and Michael Smith, manager of policy and programs environment, as well as Stantec Consulting Ltd., filled the council chambers on Dec. 19 to hear the review of the ESR.
Mark Kozak and Peter Prier, of Stantec, presented a summary report of the ESR. Council was presented with the four-inch thick ESR at their previous meeting and requested that a representative of Stantec present a summary at their next council meeting.
Council also decided to hire a company to do a third party review, following discussions from the previous meeting and EPCOR agreed to pay for this review. John Kerr, of Gamsby and Mannerow Ltd., presented the independent review of the ESR on behalf of the township.
Van Diepenbeek said following the meeting that council seemed satisfied with the summary report and independent review and had no concerns with either.
Council also received a report from Jacques Whitford Engineering on health, safety and nuisance concerns, as well as a report from the Huron County Health Unit on the effects of wind turbines on human health.
“Council is still concerned with health issues but all the information that we have received does not show a definite, clear link of health problems to wind turbines,” said Van Diepenbeek.
He added that council has had a lot of information come forward and received many comments from the public. He said that, in January, he expects council will implement the zoning requirements for wind turbines into the township’s new zoning bylaw.
Van Diepenbeek said that the general feeling from council is that the 400 metre setback from dwellings and 600 metre setback from urban areas are reasonable and he does not expect those setbacks to change. He said that EPCOR can also work within those perimeters.
By Sara Bender
Signal-Star Publishing
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Paypal) |
 (via Stripe) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=2222 ]
