[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Development Dominates Lyndon News In 2006  

Industrial wind turbines dominated the news in 2006 in northern Caledonia County, as they did in 2005.

Readers can also look forward to more stories on wind in 2007.

This is also true for news on the Ginn Development at Burke Mountain and a proposed merger between the village of Lyndonville and the town of Lyndon.

Wind Towers

In a case that was watched by wind developers around the state, the Vermont Public Service Board denied a certificate of public good for East Haven Windfarm Aug. 31. The decision was based on the fact that the developer had not conducted bird and bat studies.

This decision elated wind opponents and baffled others. EMDC, a Montpelier company doing business as East Haven Windfarm, filed a petition with the PSB Nov. 17, 2003, to construct four 1.5-megawatt turbines on East Mountain in East Haven on the site of a former military radar base. If a project of this size could not be built there, where could any wind facility in Vermont be built? That is a question still being asked. The answer may be coming in 2007.

UPC Vermont Wind hopes it will be successful in obtaining permission from the PSB to build 16 420-foot turbines in Sheffield and Sutton. The company scaled back the original application for 26 398-foot turbines, 20 in Sheffield and six in Sutton. Earlier this month, the Vermont Department of Public Service offered an opinion that no turbines should be erected in Sutton since the town plan does not allow tall structures on ridge lines and the people of Sutton do not want them.

Sheffield residents, however, voted in favor of the project and the town has an agreement with UPC to support the wind developer’s efforts before the PSB in exchange for yearly payments to the town.

UPC’s quest for a certificate of public good is far from over. More testimony will be filed in early January and technical hearings are scheduled to begin Jan. 29 and run through Feb. 9. Then more briefs will be filed in March.


By Jeanne Miles
Staff Writer


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.