LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Commissioners address wind turbine lawsuit 

Commissioners addressed another heated topic and took steps to make public research in the wind turbine lawsuit that they have been working on for the past few months.

On March 3, Judge Tracy Klinginsmith asked for commissioners to provide more information on why they made their 2-1 decision to ban wind turbines in June 2004.

Per the request and advice from the county’s legal council in this case, Attorney William Frost, commissioners directed Zoning Administrator David Stuewe to gather the information as requested by Klinginsmith, and after reviewing the information in the course of executive sessions, the 11-page packet of information was made public Monday.

Frost reviewed the document with commissioners and for the benefit of the crowd gathered at the meeting, outlining it point by point.

Following Frost’s review, commissioners made a motion to proceed with making “An Action of the Board of County Commission of Wabaunsee County, Kansas” public.

In the course of the vote, Commission Chairman Ervan Stuewe, who was the dissenting vote in the June 2004 ban on wind turbines, clarified his position.

“I support the motion to adopt the document presented because I believe it sets forth the facts and conclusions that were relied upon by a majority of the Commission when it voted 2-1 in favor of the resolution to ban industrial wind turbines in Wabaunsee County,” he said. “I opposed that resolution because I believed strict regulations would be less difficult to defend than a total ban of wind farms.”

(excerpted)

By Sarah Gooding
for The Wabaunsee County Signal-Enterprise

stpns.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky