[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine project heads to MOE  

Pending approval of an environmental screening report, Windrush Energies hopes to start construction of two wind turbine projects in East Luther Grand Valley next year. The report will likely be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment for review in the new year, says company chair John Pennie.

“We’re still going through the development phase. We’re not ready to announce the program as final,” he told The Banner. “We’ve been working on it several years. There’s a lot of investment required up front.”

The company is proposing to erect a total of 12 wind turbines at the Ashton Ridge Golf Course on County Road 25, split into two projects of six turbines each. Windrush Energies has signed on to lease about 800 acres for the combined projects.

“The expectation is that we’ll get part of that completed in the summer of 2007, and the balance by the winter,” Pennie said of constructing the turbines.

“Once we have a certificate [of approval from the MOE], we would expect to proceed when the turbines are available,” he continued. “There’s a world shortage of turbines. We’ve had them on order for some time, but the deliveries are slipping, so it’s rather imprecise when they’re going to be available.”

Windrush Energies first approached East Luther Grand Valley council with the projects in the summer of 2005. Several public meetings have since been held, most recently on Nov. 27 to receive public input on the environmental screening report.

“A year and a half ago [council] approved a temporary use bylaw because our zoning bylaw and official plan is in the process of being updated,” explained CAO/clerk Jane Wilson.

Before the project can move forward, council approval of a site plan is required.

For the last 18 months or so, the company has been monitoring wind strength in the area with two test towers.

“The wind is better there than a project that I was considering in Adjala a couple of years ago – it’s about 50 per cent stronger,” Pennie said, explaining Windrush withdrew from the Adjala project because the wind wasn’t strong enough.

The MOE will be reviewing the company report to ensure the proposals meet all existing regulations and that any concerns are mitigated. Public comments will be included in the ministry review.

By Richard Vivian


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.