[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Sugared words about Lewis wind farm project  

The dogs in the street know that wind-farm developers are notoriously prone to exaggeration. Hence the slimline version of the monster wind factory that Amec and British Energy (aka Lewis Wind Power) revealed to the world this week.

They will claim, no doubt, that the reduction of their proposed scheme from 243 massive 400ft turbines to only 181 was motivated by their regard for the integrity of the natural environment of Lewis and that nothing as base as a desire to collect vast amounts of subsidised, government money affected their decision to downscale.

Wind-farm developers have been known to deliberately oversize their first planning application by applying for more turbines than they expect to get permission for, so that when the “real” application goes in they cynically can pretend how much their re-application was influenced by fears of the adverse effects on the environment that would have resulted from the original.

Communities are likewise cajoled with sugared words and promises. People are duped into believing that these companies care about the communities they are so eager to exploit rapaciously.

In the Chicago Tribune of October 9, a spokesman for Lewis Wind Power, who rather curiously seems to distance himself from his employer, is quoted as saying, “I know these big multinationals are not coming here to save Lewis.

If the wind didn’t blow they wouldn’t give a damn about us.”

Well, the wind does blow and they still don’t give a damn.

Colin N Maclean,17 South Bragar, Isle of Lewis.

theherald.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: