[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ill wind still blows over revised energy farm plans  

Lewis residents and conservation groups have vowed to continue to fight attempts to build the UK’s largest on-shore wind farm on the Hebridean island after plans were submitted today for a revised scheme with 53 fewer turbines.

Improvements in renewable technology have allowed the developers, Lewis Wind Farm, to cut the number of proposed turbines by 23% from 234 to 181, with only a 7% reduction in the amount of power the plant could produce.

The revised plans are likely to get the backing of the Western Isles council, which supported the original proposals in principle, but questioned the location of 25 wind turbines. All but four of those turbines had been cut from the revised plans, as well as 32 others.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) said it was “enormously concerned” by the plans, which it claimed flouted European rules on protecting wildlife. The area is home to eight species of Europe’s most endangered birds, including eight pairs of golden eagles.

The society said it was worried that insensitive placement of the 140m turbines could destroy the habitat of wading birds and possibly cause collisions between larger birds. It said a new wind farm in Norway was currently killing off endangered white-tailed sea eagles at the rate of one a month.

Stuart Housden, the director of RSPB Scotland, said: “This application to locate the UK’s largest wind farm on top of one of Scotland’s most sensitive and important sites for wildlife is of enormous concern.”

He said the revised proposals still amounted to “a large, industrial-scale development which includes not only wind turbines but an extensive road network, pylons, miles of cabling, substations and quarries”.

“It is hard to imagine that all this can be delivered without having some significant level of impact on such an important environmental areas which has EU protection.”

The original plans prompted 4,000 islanders to sign a petition against them. Catriona Campbell, the chair of Moorland Without Turbines, which organised the petition, said the revised plans were “outrageous and completely unacceptable”.

She said the timing of the new planning application, just before Christmas, would restrict public consultation over the plans.

“These planning applications are enormous technical documents which are extremely difficult reading. To ask people to do this over the festive season is unbelievable. This cynical move by Lewis Wind Power shows the contempt with which they hold this community. Ballot after ballot has told them to leave, but we seen them returning once more. It is a disgrace.”

Calum Ian McIver, the head of economic development, at Western Isles council, said local opposition to the scheme had been exaggerated.

“There is a hard core of 10 or so people who are actively against it,” he said and pointed out that an Ispsos Mori poll in August found that 41% of islanders backed the plans, while 40% were against them.

He said: “It represents a significant social and economic opportunity and it will make a national contribution to tackling global warming and reducing carbon emissions.”

Alasdair Morrison, the Labour MSP for the Western Isles, also backed the plans, saying they would “play an important role in the future prosperity of the Outer Hebrides”.

“The Outer Herbrides has the best renewable resources in the European Union. I am committed to ensuring that our communities are at the forefront of the renewable energy revolution.”

Mr Morrison said he would urge the RSPB to fully consider the application before forming an opinion.

The developers have promised that the wind farm would generate 400 local jobs during its four-year construction and £3m a year in rent when it began operating.

By Matt Weaver


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.