LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Court takes up fight over wind farm fight 

A dispute over whether an energy company should be allowed to put 25 wind turbines in Bear Creek Township is now in the hands of Commonwealth Court.

The court heard about 20 minutes of arguments Monday on whether a Luzerne County judge erred earlier this year when he overturned a decision by township supervisors not to issue a permit to Energy Unlimited to erect the turbines.

In May, township supervisors voted 2-1 against a plan to install the turbines on Penobscot Mountain because they felt Energy Unlimited had substantially changed its development plans since first proposing the wind farm in 2003.

The company went to court over the rejection, convincing Luzerne County President Judge Michael Conahan to overturn the supervisors’ decision. That prompted the supervisors to appeal to Commonwealth Court.

During arguments Monday, township solicitor William Vinsko told a three-judge panel of the state court that Energy Unlimited made “substantial changes” to its wind farm proposal that led supervisors to reject it.

“What was submitted (initially) really was a sketch plan,” Mr. Vinsko told the judges. “The new plan that was submitted had many changes, many modifications.”

Attorney Ernest Preate Jr., who represents Energy Unlimited, countered that the plan rejected by township supervisors last spring had only “minor modifications” from the original plan, and supervisors were wrong to vote it down.

“We believe that all through this process we have complied and complied and complied,” Mr. Preate said.

The outcome of the case could affect Energy Unlimited’s plans to put an additional nine turbines on land near Crystal Lake owned by Luzerne County.

By Michael Race
Harrisburg Bureau Chief

thetimes-tribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky