[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Try multi-category search (beta) »


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Appeals Launched Over Species Protection  

The state’s attempt to balance wind power generation with wildlife protection on a western Maryland mountaintop is under attack from both sides.

Annapolis-based developer Synergics Inc. is appealing a Public Service Commission hearing examiner’s Oct. 30 recommendation for approval of the company’s 17-turbine project atop Backbone Mountain in Garrett County. Synergics’ appeal will focus on conditions proposed by the Department of Natural Resources to protect habitat for rare and endangered species, the company’s spokesman said Friday.

Five opponents of the project, including Baltimore-based environmental activist Ajax Eastman and the Maryland Alliance for Greenway Improvement and Conservation, also have appealed the recommended order. Most of them believe the environmental restrictions don’t go far enough.

“Essentially, we feel that the proposed order does not adequately protect rare and threatened and otherwise protected species that may be on site, and want to make sure that the Public Service Commission approves projects that adequately research, study and contemplate impacts on wildlife,” said Erik Bluemel, an attorney representing Eastman, MAGIC and Bowie-based environmentalist D. Daniel Boone.

The commission will receive all parties’ written arguments by Dec. 30 and then issue a final order, PSC spokeswoman Bethany M. Gill said.

Synergics wants to place 17 giant, three-bladed windmills along a three-mile stretch of Backbone Mountain about 15 miles south of Deep Creek Lake. The company contends the 40-megawatt project would help electric utilities in Maryland meet a state-mandated goal of producing 7.5 percent of electricity from renewable resources by 2017.

Opponents have argued in previous filings that the turbines would do more environmental harm than good by killing large numbers of migrating birds and bats, marring the mountain landscape and disturbing neighbors with noise from their whirling blades.

Hearing Examiner David L. Moore generally rejected those arguments in his Oct. 30 decision but upheld 24 conditions proposed by the DNR to minimize environmental harm. One condition would bar construction in two sections of the project site to preserve habitat for 17 rare species, including the state-endangered mourning warbler, the state-endangered Allegheny wood rat and the globally rare timber rattlesnake.

Frank Maisano, who represents a coalition of Mid-Atlantic wind-power developers including Synergics, said Friday the company’s appeal would “seek to make some clarifications” about the so-called exclusion zones.

“We will make some recommendations on how to resolve the issues in a fair way that protects the environment and still allows the project to be competitive,” Maisano said.

He and Furqan Siddiqi, vice president of development for Synergics Energy Services, said in July that realigning the 420-foot turbines to avoid the exclusion zones could hurt the project because some turbines would be in less windy spots or in locations that would be costlier to service.

The other interveners filing appeals were Boone’s brother Jon Boone, a Garrett County resident who contends Synergics has exaggerated the project’s potential electricity output; and Washington-based attorney Paul C. Sprenger, a Garrett County land owner and developer concerned about a possible drop in property values.

The PSC granted permits in 2003 to two other western Maryland wind power projects but neither has been built. A 40-turbine project planned in Garrett County by Clipper Windpower Inc. is the subject of a court fight. A 24-turbine project planned in Allegany County by US Wind Force has been stalled by the company’s negotiations with a potential buyer of the electricity, Maisano said in late October.


On the Net:

Case No. 9008, Public Service Commission: http://www.psc.state.md.us/psc/

By David Dishneau
The Associated Press


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.