[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind-power plan derails conservation easement 

A proposal for a wind-powered generating facility on the 23,781-acre Phillips Brook industrial forest is dashing immediate hopes of a $3.5 million permanent conservation easement on the parcel.

Officials with the Society for the Protection of N.H. Forests confirmed that the easement – considered a keystone in a 180,000-acre forest between Milan and Dixville Notch in Coos County, and the state’s top priority for funding from the federal Forest Legacy Program for 2008 – is out for now.

“They are looking at a wind power generation proposal and Forest Legacy easements prohibit the construction of commercial structures on land under such an easement,” said Jack Savage, spokesman for the society, who confirmed reports that the land managers want to pursue wind opportunities instead of federally funded easements.

The development moves three other projects to the top of the state’s list for the Forest Legacy funds: the Ossipee Pine Barrens, a large tract near the Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation center in Greenfield, and Green Acres, a massive woodlot in Grafton County extending from Lyme to Dorchester and Wentworth.

“There was no guarantee we were getting the money for Phillips Brook anyway,” Savage said yesterday. He confirmed that GMO Renewable Resources, LLC, which manages the massive Phillips Brook tract for wood products, had withdrawn its federal application.

GMORR Director Bob Saul said it will take some time to work out a boundary between the proposed conservation easement and the acreage required for a potential wind-power project. The idea for the easement is still out there, he said, but it can’t immediately go forward.

The Forest Society’s Savage said, “We are disappointed as well because we have been working on this for a dozen years. This is the closest we have got but we understand it is about willing landowners and we will continue working along those lines,” he said.

The Forest Society supports wind power in concept, he said, “but there is still a lot of issues about appropriate siting. We would want to look at what the pros and cons are,” he said.

By Paula Tracy
Union Leader Staff


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky