Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Bear Creek supervisors reject plan for additional wind turbines
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Supervisors voted 2-1 Monday to reject Energy Unlimited’s proposal for a variance to build nine turbines near Crystal Lake on Luzerne County owned land, as the company’s attorney vowed to appeal the decision to county President Judge Michael Conahan.
Supervisor Gary Slusser dissented, as he has in previous votes involving Energy Unlimited. Supervisors Ruth Koval and Bonnie Wasilewski said they just followed the planning commission’s recommendation. The planning commission voted 3-1 to reject Energy Unlimited’s plan at its October meeting.
“We are not against windmills,” Wasilewski said. “Everyone needs to follow the rules and the correct procedures.”
The nine turbines are part of the Energy Unlimited’s overall proposed Penobscot Mountain wind farm plan to construct 34 turbines on the Theta land. The other 25 turbines await a Commonwealth Court hearing Dec. 11.
Energy Unlimited representatives outlined its case in a 25-minute presentation, prior to the vote. Project coordinator Ed Shoener and lead engineer Walter Poplawski explained the impact of the proposed wind turbines, and attorney Ernest Preate Jr. clarified information.
“It seems like (the supervisors) had their minds made up before tonight,” Preate said after the meeting. “A decision that’s based on politics and private prejudice is not going to be tolerated by my clients or the public courts.”
The wind farm would have minimal environmental impact and would provide revenue for the township, the men said. In addition, Penobscot Mountain provides “ideal conditions” for wind turbines, they said.
Wind turbines run by Enxco in the township earn $3,000 in revenue yearly.
“I hope it’s going to go through,” Slusser said of Energy Unlimited’s plans. “It’s going to be a windfall for the township.”
By Coulter Jones
Staff Writer
cjones@citizensvoice.com
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: