[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Home wind turbines 'may actually do more harm than good'  

Home wind turbines have become the must-have home improvement among people eager to help save the planet and flaunt their green credentials.

Dubbed ‘the ultimate green fashion statement’, are selling in their thousands amid claims they can cut household electricity bills by 30 per cent.

But now environmental campaigners say the windmills are not quite what they claim to be – and may actually do more harm than good.

As well as being noisy and unsightly, they barely produce enough electricity to power a hairdryer in many houses.

They also do nothing to tackle greenhouses gases, while there are far better ways to cut down on energy bills.

Although there are currently just 650 home wind turbines installed that number is set to grow massively as the makers of the most popular wind turbine, Windsave, have had orders of more than 15,000 ahead of Christmas for their WS1000 unit which sells for just under £1,500 at B&Q.

Fans of wind turbines include David Cameron, who plans to install one in his west London home, Jamie Oliver, and the new science minister Malcolm Wicks.

But Friends of the Earth expert Nick Rau said there are other more practical – if less fashionable – ways of saving energy.

‘A wind turbine on the roof is a glamourous statement – people want to be seen to be doing something.

‘But loft or cavity wall insulation may be more effective – and will probably pay for itself a lot quicker.’

Cavity wall insulation costs around £300-£500 and can save around £150 a year in fuel bils. Wind turbines could only make a similar saving if perched on house on top of a hill in the countryside.

But turbines in towns suffer from a lack of wind – as tall buildings block the air supply. The average windspeed in Britain is 5.6 metres per second – roughly enough to generate around half a kilowatt of electricity, or enough to power a hairdryer.

This would work out at a maximum saving of £100 a year – so it would take around 15 years to pay for itself.

Wind turbines do not figure in the top ten ways to save energy in Britain.The government’s Energy Saving Trust recommends 10 more energy efficient measures, such as lagging the hotwater tank, cavity wall installation, using low-energy light bulbs, drawing the curtains at night, and turning the thermostat down by one degree.

The turbines must be professionally installed and can, in some instances, result in the whole house vibrating.

Jane Vaus, of the Micropower Council, an industry body promoting small scale energy generation said: ‘There is a bit of novelty value at the moment. You wouldn’t say to friends ”come look at my cavity wall insulation”. But a wind turbine is much more interesting.’

Alternative energy expert Nick Martins, warns that the turbine can cause instability on some buildings.

He said ‘This is not the same thing as fitting a satellite dish on the side of a house. I would guess that the lateral thrust exerted by these turbines on a Victorian chimney stack in a high wind would be more than sufficient to topple it.’

The noise generated by a Windsave turbine is 40 decibels – ‘the sound of two people walking in front of your house talking’ according to Paul Johnson, buying manager for B&Q.

The DIY giant said that structural surveys will reveal whether the building is strong enough to take the structure – and would never fit it to a chimney.

‘We have had to turn a few people down as their roofs are not strong enough,’ he said. The turbines have to have planning permission as well.

B&Q said the turbines are on sale in 107 out of their 320 shops. She said: ‘Since going on sale, the biggest selling product line in value out of 43,000 items is our £1,500 wind turbine.’

Scotland has had the biggest sales so far, followed by the West Midlands, London and the Home Counties.


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.