[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bear Creek Twp. windmill flap takes center stage tonight 

Bear Creek Township’s ongoing feud over wind turbines continues tonight, when supervisors will vote at their 6:30 p.m. meeting whether to approve nine wind turbines proposed by Energy Unlimited.

Like previous votes regarding the proposed Penobscot Mountain wind farm, it will likely take the courts, not the municipal government, to sort it out.

The nine wind turbines – called the back nine – are part of Energy Unlimited’s overall plan to construct 34 wind turbines near Crystal Lake on the 7,000-acre Theta land owned by Luzerne County. The other 25 turbines await a Commonwealth Court decision, which could effect the back nine. Plans for the nine turbines would not work without the other 25.

Supervisors originally voted 2-1 in May to reject the turbines, but Luzerne County President Judge Michael Conahan overturned the supervisors’ decision Aug. 11 based on an appeal from Energy Unlimited. Supervisors voted 2-1 to appeal the decision a week later. Supervisor Gary Slusser dissented both times.

Energy Unlimited’s attorney Ernest Preate Jr. said his client will appeal the supervisors’ decision if it is rejected without merit.

The planning commission rejected the proposal 3-1 at its October meeting, but that vote is just a recommendation for the supervisors. Supervisors have yet to receive the commissions written recommendation.

Supervisors Ruth Koval and Bonnie Wasilewski declined to comment about the wind turbines because of the pending vote and ongoing court case. Slusser, however, said he would likely vote for the additional nine, as he did the front 25.

As they await the commonweath’s decision, both side continues to argue the merits of the plans.

Opponents argue that installing the turbines will:

n ruin one of Northeastern Pennsylvania’s “environmental gems” and a watershed area.

n use the donated Theta land for a purpose not intended, which was to for preservation.

Proponents, meanwhile, say:

# Energy Unlimited has followed township rules in applying for permits.

# appealing decisions will cost the township in excessive legal fees. Solicitor Bill Vinsko is paid $90 per hour for his work.

“It’s going to cost us megabucks,” Slusser said, “and it’s not (Koval and Wasilewski’s) money. It’s the township’ money.”

By Coulter Jones
Staff Writer


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky