LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind-power's risks discussed 

About 100 Cambria and Somerset county residents gathered Thursday to learn more about potential risks of placing energy turbines on ridgetops, an issue now in the news.

Representatives of wind-development companies, as well as the state’s Department of Environmental Protection, declined to speak at the forum
on wind energy Thursday at Pitt-Johnstown.

Dan Boone, a Maryland-based consulting conservation biologist, disputed what he called exaggerated claims by the wind-power industry: That it can reduce the country’s reliance on foreign oil; that it can provide a meaningful solution to air pollution problems; and that it can reduce rates of burning and mining coal.

And local physician Dr. Kelly Warshel gave a presentation on a condition called wind-turbine syndrome, the symptoms of which include sleep problems, headache, exhaustion, dizziness, lack of concentration and ringing in the ears.

While a handful of township supervisors in northern Somerset County consider ordinances to limit turbines, proponents of wind energy claim the county’s first-of-its-kind ordinance already makes erecting turbines difficult.

Pennsylvania, unlike nearby states, still has no official commission or permit process designated for wind farms.

A 2005 Government Accountability Office report called on federal officials to be more active in regulating wind-power development and be more attentive to the needs of the ecosystem.

Opponents say that wind farms on ridges kill a significant number of bats and birds, though there have been few significant studies.

Proponents say that, although turbines kill birds and bats, they do not do so in significant numbers.

By Kecia Bal
The Tribune-Democrat

tribune-democrat.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky