[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Farms 'Blight Coal-Ravaged County' ; Durham Has Suffered Enough, Say Objectors  

The latest in a cluster of wind farms for a corner of County Durham goes before councillors this week.

The plan by EDF Energy is for four 102-metre turbines at Broom Hill Farm, between the villages of Sunniside and Stanley Crook.

The site is within a 12-mile-wide circle which includes the Tow Law and High Hed-ley sites, which each have three turbines, and others at High Hedley and Satley with planning permission for a total of 16 turbines.

Wear Valley councillors will be told on Thursday that from some viewpoints the turbines would appear as a single windfarm of 26 machines.

The Broom Hill site, part of which has been opencast in the past, consists of a conifer plantation and grazing land.

It also has what remains of Stanley Moss, a blanket peat bog which is designated as a Site of Nature Conservation Importance and a County Wildlife Site.

A total of 15 acres of conifers would be felled and restoration work would be carried out on areas of the bog which were planted with trees.

EDF has said it would restore Stanley Moss as a nature reserve, and native trees would be planted in the area.

But the Campaign to Protect Rural England, which has objected to the proposal, says the landscape has suffered in the past and should be saved from what it describes as an intrusive development. CPRE says it is concerned at the cumulative effect of the current and proposed windfarms. Objectors argue there are already enough turbines in the county, that the area has already been exploited by the coal industry for many years, turbines are inefficient generators of power and will ruin views.

But planners, who are recommending approval, say last year’s North-East Renewable Energy strategy recognised scope for wind farms in the Wear Valley district was severely limited by protected landscapes and built-up areas. But the strategy does accept small- scale wind farms may be acceptable in some areas where the landscape is not designated – such as the proposal site.

According to planners, the scheme would not have a significant impact on the character of the landscape.

By Tony Henderson, Environment Editor

The Journal, Newcastle-upon-Tyne

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.