[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Skyline double standard claimed 

A city property developer is calling on the Palmerston North City Council to obey to its own rules.

Building restrictions have been placed on a subdivision being built in Pacific Drive so it didn’t affect Turitea Valley residents’ view of the skyline, Brian Green Property Group owner Brian Green said.

But the council supports the building of wind turbines in the Turitea Reserve, he said.

“It’s not consistent.”

The wind turbines in the proposed Turitea wind farm are expected to be 125 metres high, including the blade.

Mr Green said his company is building a subdivision on Pacific Drive on 101 hectares of land.

He said when he applied for consent from the council two years ago there were various controls relating to the height of the houses.

The buildings were limited to six metres in height, normally it’s nine metres in a residential zone.

“The reasoning for this is to protect people in Turitea Valley and Valley View Road from people looking down on them.”

But wind turbines don’t seem to be a problem, he said.

Mr Green said he put in a submission to the council’s consultation on the change of purpose to the Turitea Reserve to allow renewable energy asking what height restrictions would be apply to the wind farm.

“If the council is going to get involved in business, it should be subject to the rules.”

The Manawatu Standard asked the council why the height restrictions on building in the Turitea Valley did not apply to building wind turbines, why were the height restrictions put there in the first place and is it fair that the council has put building restrictions in place that it doesn’t have to abide by?

In reply public affairs manager Malcolm Hopwood issued the following statement to the Manawatu Standard:

“Any wind farm proposal will be subject to a publicly notified resource consent where all effects (visual/landscape etc) will be considered. Such a resource consent will be determined by an independent commissioner(s))not by the council.”

By Helen Harvey


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky