[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Rush zoners shoot down wind farm proposal 

A plan that could eventually result in a wind farm was shot down Tuesday by the Rush Township Zoning Hearing Board, which unanimously voted to prohibit a 197-foot mast that would be used to study the feasibility of the project.

According Josh Framel and Peter Kennon, of Gamesa Energy, the mast would be used to gather meteorological date on the Broad Mountain, approximately a mile and a half north of Hometown, and up from the Wal-Mart construction site on property owned by Kenneth Breisch. The tower site would cover just under two acres and Kennon said the tract is “remote and landlocked.”

“Because of the exposure to the prevailing winds, the site is an ideal candidate,” he said.

The firm was looking for relief from height restrictions and work was scheduled to begin next month.

“What we’re trying to do is learn if it is a viable site for a future wind farm,” Framel told the board. “We can’t even say if the site would be fit for (wind) turbines.”

Had the plan been approved, the 8-inch diameter mast would have been removed after four years of data collection.

Resident Michelle Griffiths asked if there would be any impact on wildlife in the area and Kennon said no studies had been conducted on the site.

“Then, I guess it’s safe to say that you don’t know,” Griffiths replied.

Marion Lazur, who owns property adjacent to Breisch, said the project would have a negative impact.

“We like to keep things the way they are,” she commented.

Breisch testified that the property is of no value, except for possible residential development.

“I don’t think we want to see that,” he said.

He added that wind power is a good choice and makes a better neighbor than a nuclear power plant.

When asked if the firm planned to appeal the board’s decision, Kennon said he had no comment.

By Richard W. Funk

Times News

25 October 2006

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky