[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Potential nightmare from the windfarm 

You report Environment Secretary David Miliband as “paving the way for a new generation of giant wind turbines” – (“Miliband puts wind turbines at the top of green agenda”, September 28).

The previous day Mr Miliband spoke on the Today programme on Radio 4 and said: “Wind cannot provide the base load.”

If Mr Milliband, with his background of political science, understands what “base load” means, and if he accedes to Sir David King’s suggestion that we should have 40 per cent of nuclear power (i.e. most of the baseload), then a substantial amount of windpower may not only be undesirable but potentially dangerous, as its installed capacity might exceed the installed capacity of the coal- and gas-fired generation which allow load-following. Thus, vagary of wind could cause fluctuations of generation greater than load-following could cope with.

A recent submission to the Institution of Electrical Engineers and to the Edinburgh Royal Society sums up the matter: “As a retired grid control engineer my instincts react against all thought of unpredictable renewable power on the scale proposed, sloshing around the system… At minimum levels of system demand with fixed base load operation of nuclear plant, in turbulent conditions, the control of system frequency would become a nightmare.”

If your report is correct it is outrageous that “Mr Miliband mocked campaigners who oppose the construction of windfarms”.

We who oppose this lunacy are concerned mainly for the security of electricity supply in the UK, and deserve better than ministerial mockery – which no doubt shows that no sane reply can justify such ignorant political “diktats” as the present “rush for wind”.

Dr John Etherington

Llanhowell, Pembrokeshire


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky