[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farms may suffer in plan to boost other fuel sources  

The government is proposing to favour some renewable energy sources over others in an attempt to kick-start types of green power that have been slow to take off.

The approach could mean that less well developed forms of renewable energy, such as marine or solar power, receive more subsidy in the form of Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs). Established forms of renewables, such as onshore wind farms, could receive fewer ROCs.

The proposals to reform the ROC system were issued for consultation today as Alistair Darling, the Trade and Industry Secretary, stuck the first spade in the ground at what will be Britain’s biggest onshore wind farm – Whitelee – operated by ScottishPower on Eaglesham Moor outside Glasgow.

The Government’s plans for a fivefold increase in electricity generated from renewable sources have stirred debate in the industry. Philip Bowman, ScottishPower chief executive, has said that the new banding of subsidies could discourage development of onshore wind power. ScottishPower, which will spend £300 million on Whitelee, is the largest developer and owner of onshore wind power in the UK.

Mr Bowman has said that prospects for onshore wind development are not improving and could suffer further at the expense of other forms of renewable generation that were “exceedingly immature” and “economically . . . exceedingly inefficient”.

Alistair Buchanan, Ofgem’s chief executive, has also admitted that the uncertainty surrounding the Renewables Obligation was making it difficult to attract capital.

By Angela Jameson


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.