LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Keep wind turbines out of county 

Wind turbine companies and their corporate promoters are limited liability partnerships owned by oil and power companies. They are nothing but gigantic tax shelters, subsidized by our government, that only accidentally generate even a smidgen of electricity.

Thomas O. Grey states in a recent letter that wind turbines create no pollution, and conveniently neglects to describe the environmental disaster of clear-cutting a mountaintop, ramming through an 80-foot-wide service road, because the turbine parts are unutterably gigantic.

He makes no mention of how many tons of stone, dirt and concrete must be removed, moved in or relocated for the turbines huge foundations, to say nothing of the massive equipment necessary to erect these monstrosities. No mention at all of sun-shadow casting and light strobing effects.

No discussion at all about lightning attraction or stray voltage to ground, two very dangerous side effects, and no suggestion at all of the bald-faced obscenity of five 420-foot tall behemoths in a rural landscape such as Savoy.

Columnist Lauren Stevens, described as an environmentalist, recently wrote that the only consideration concerning wind turbines should be their location.

If one adds the fact that electricity generated by turbines goes into the power grid directly and is not allocated specifically for any one area or town the towers are located in, then logically, wind turbines can be placed anywhere near existing electrical lines and should never be near inhabited areas or neighborhoods like Savoy’s proposed wind turbines.

Our politicians are opposed to wind turbines near Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket because of the eyesore component. Why are the sensibilities of rich vacationers more important than Berkshire County residents? What hypocrisy.

David Vittone
Savoy

berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky