[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Protesters challenge windfarm expansion  

Campaigners have challenged Highland Council’s decision to approve an extension to a controversial Caithness windfarm.

Renewable Energy Systems has been allowed to add four more turbines to the existing two at the entrance to New Park’s technology park at Forss.

The area planning committee agreed the extension after Graeme Smith exercised his chairman’s casting vote in favour of the scheme following a tied 3-3 vote.

The Caithness Windfarm Information Forum (CWIF) wants a re-run, claiming councillors were given incorrect and incomplete information by officials.

It has lodged a formal complaint to council chief executive Arthur McCourt over material contained within the report prepared for the committee.

The development, near the Dounreay atom plant, was approved despite objections from New Park and local residents.

CWIF spokesman Stuart Young said the officials’ advice contradicted the authority’s own guidelines on green energy planning because Forss is not considered a “possible or preferred area” for small-scale windfarm development.

He said officials also failed to highlight that the proposed extension, under the guidelines, should be at least three miles from the existing turbines and that councillors should have been told of potential community benefit from the development.

Mr Smith said: “I believe due process was followed. The committee, collectively, came to a decision based on policy and the material considerations presented to them on the day.” A council spokeswoman added: “We have received the letter from CWIF and we will get back to them in due course.”


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.