[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Community council defers wind farm decision  

Penicuik community councillors have put off announcing their views on the proposed wind farm near the town for another month.

Member of Penicuik and District Community Council were expected to give their opinion on E.ON’s plans for 18 turbines on Auchencorth Moss, south of the town.

But last week they deferred a decision until community councillors canvassed the views of residents in their neighbourhoods.

A straw poll carried out at the meeting showed that all but one of the community councillors present were opposed to the wind farm development.

However, they were reminded that votes were to be made not according to their personal views but the opinion of the Penicuik population.

Secretary Dr Derek Cosens, a retired university biologist, said he was opposed to the proposed development. “For E.ON to say Auchencorth Moss is environmentally sensitive is absolute tosh. We in Scotland live in the last remaining wilderness in Europe and Auchencorth Moss is part of that. If we put an industrial site there and destroy it, what do we gain from that? We might get £100,000 to put Penicuik town centre right,” he claimed.

Treasurer Jamie Tennent, in favour of the renewable energy development, said it was a matter of aesthetics. He pointed out that people had strong views for and against turbines but the technology was becoming more and more efficient. In addition, electricity storage from renewable energy was also being developed.

In his absence, planning convener Mike Jackson had drawn up a paper for community councillors to consider with the pros and cons of the proposed development.

He pointed out that it is usually opponents who will make their voices heard with the bulk of the British public remaining neutral.



This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.