[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cape compact shelves position  


By David Schoetz, Staff Writer

BARNSTABLE – Wary of giving the slightest appearance of a Cape Wind endorsement, the Cape Light Compact governing board this week tabled a resolution supporting renewable energy.

The governing board, made up of appointees from all 21 towns on Cape Cod and Martha’s Vineyard, has resisted taking a formal position on the offshore wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound despite lobbying efforts by the project’s supporters – including Cape Wind developer Jim Gordon – and opponents.

The Compact, which represents the combined interests of the region’s electric consumers, considered a resolution in June that conditionally backed the development of wind energy off the Cape’s coast. After the effort failed, the contentious Cape Wind issue was tabled for the summer.

This week, board members, who are appointed by local leaders, discussed a much broader resolution that recognized the need to confront a dangerous reliance on fossil fuels by embracing various renewable energy technologies. ”This resolution is not to be construed as the Compact supporting any particular development,” the language read.

But that assurance failed to satisfy board members, who ultimately voted 11-5 to indefinitely table the resolution and, effectively, any further discussion about Cape Wind.

”This causes so much controversy,” said Audrey Loughnane, Barnstable’s Compact member and one of the most vocal critics of the resolution. ”We all know it’s about the wind farm,” she said.

Robert Jones, the Sandwich member, agreed that backing the proposed resolution would be perceived by the public as the Compact’s support for Cape Wind. In the past, Jones has reminded some board members that the towns they represent have taken formal positions against the proposed wind farm. He also said the Compact already supports renewable energy.

In addition to offering customers a renewable ”green” power option at a premium price, one of the agency’s goals listed in the Compact’s governing document is ”to utilize and encourage renewable energy development to the extent practicable.”

At the end of September, the Compact will receive the results of a $100,000 study to determine whether becoming an electricity cooperative would benefit Cape and Vineyard customers. A cooperative model could allow the Compact to own and operate local renewable energy projects and enter into long-term wholesale pricing contracts, which Gordon says he wants.

But to Chris Powicki, principal of Water Energy & Ecology Information Services and a Compact watchdog, the resolution’s specific recognition that renewable energy sources ”would better serve” the region than fossil fuel sources would have been a valuable step.

Powicki criticized the agency for allowing the politics of the Cape Wind issue to undercut a resolution that so clearly avoided an endorsement. ”This benign resolution gives them an opportunity to step beyond the 800-pound gorilla and take a proactive stance,” he said.

Not every board member was against taking up the resolution. Richard Philbrick of Orleans, for example, said the group tasked with representing the region’s electricity interests sits around ”quibbling” while a utility-scale renewable energy project is proposed locally. ”We talk about a kilowatt here, a kilowatt there,” Philbrick said. ”This is one of the few places you can get megawatts.”

But Barry Worth, the Harwich member, seemed to summarize the agency’s consensus opinion on Cape Wind. ”It would be nice if it would just go away,” he said.

David Schoetz can be reached at dschoetz@capecodonline.com.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.