[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Should state take over local wind farm decision? 


County says “˜no,’ company says “˜yes’

By Mike Johnston

The major sticking point surrounding Horizon Wind Energy’s planned wind farm northwest of Ellensburg comes to this: should state government override Kittitas County’s rejection of the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project and consider approving it?

The wind farm developer and project supporters say yes; Kittitas County officials and opponents of the site 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg say no.

County commissioners on June 6 voted unanimously to deny approval of the project stating that plans to lessen the wind farm’s impact were not enough to make it compatible with the surrounding property.

On June 20, Horizon Wind Energy, the Houston-based wind-power development company proposing the wind farm, called on the state’s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, or EFSEC, to pre-empt the county decision.

Horizon wants EFSEC to make its own decision whether the project can comply, or become consistent, with Kittitas County land-use rules.

EFSEC, after up to two weeks of hearings in Ellensburg starting Monday, will form a recommendation on the project and give it to the governor who makes the final decision.

Horizon maintains that provisions in state law allow the state in this project to lay aside the county decision, and give the state authority to make its own determination whether to allow the 65-turbine project on both sides of U.S. Highway 97 and spread on 6,000 acres.

The company claims the county’s overly restrictive requirements are not supported in impact studies and its convoluted review process, along with unnecessarily wide buffers around turbines, make the project economically unfeasible.

Horizon, in documents filed with EFSEC, said the region’s need for more clean power overrides the county’s decision, and that the county’s wind farm review process doesn’t meet the state’s policies for expedited review that’s not duplicated.

“Kittitas County has shown little or no interest in meeting these state policies,” stated a Horizon legal declaration. “It has created largely duplicative, time consuming and highly complex licensing and (environmental) compliance processes that provide none of the predictability needed for planning renewable energy facilities … ”

Kittitas County officials contend EFSEC doesn’t have the legal authority under the state Growth Management Act to “bulldoze” its way over the act and override the county commissioners’ decision to reject the wind farm.

“The county has complied with all state land-use regulations on this,” said Jim Hurson, the county’s chief civil prosecutor. “We don’t believe the applicant acted in good faith to resolve the issues brought up by the county.”

When county commissioners asked Horizon to consider setbacks or buffers wider than those proposed by the company, Horizon said it would reduce the project to, perhaps, only 30 turbines, not enough to make it economically viable.

Hurson said there are alternative locations for Horizon’s project.

“This wind farm doesn’t meet the state’s interests for approval, given the major zoning and land-use issues it creates and in light of the relatively minor amount of power it will produce,” Hurson said.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky