[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbines harm area, campaigners warn 


By Dave Black, The Journal

Coutryside guardians yesterday echoed fears that the drive to generate green energy was threatening serious harm to Northumberland’s vital tourism industry.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England says the potential influx of hundreds of huge wind turbines would damage the county’s natural assets and hamper its ability to attract more visitors and their spending power.

The CPRE also accused the British Wind Energy Association – which represents green energy developers – of using “flimsy evidence” to support its counter-claim that wind farms can attract tourists.

The Journal revealed on Saturday that Northumberland Tourism – the agency set up this year to promote the county’s visitor industry – was worried about the impact of large numbers of 120m turbines on the area’s natural beauty and tranquillity.

NT board members have been alarmed at research by VisitScotland which found that 38% of visitors said wind farms spoiled the scenery and 26% felt they would be less likely to visit if wind farms were developed.

In response, the BWEA said there was also extensive research which showed that once turbines were built, they attracted visitors.

It said a Mori study in Argyll had found that twice as many people would come back because of the presence of wind farms than would stay away because of them.

CPRE Northumberland chairman Dominic Coupe said the BWEA was making bold claims based on flimsy evidence. He said the Argyll survey was four years old and the BWEA’s “twice as many” claim reflected the opinion of just 12 people in a survey of only 307 individuals.

“It’s a tiny percentage of a pretty small number and we certainly wouldn’t make a similar claim based on such seemingly flimsy data.”

He said: “Northumberland Tourism is right to be concerned about the potential impact of wind farms on visitor numbers. In the most sparsely populated areas, tourism accounts for a massive 37% of the economy. We welcome Northumberland Tourism’s call for an up-to-date and independent survey.”

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky