LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bruce County hears another objection to wind farm proposal 

lucknowsentinel.com

By Pat Halpin,
Special to The Sentinel

Lucknow Sentinel – Bruce County heard another objection to Enbridge’s wind farm proposal for Kincardine.

Ron Mattmer said controversy on county council and in the community over the 121-turbine proposal points to the need for provincial regulations on wind farms.

He’s concerned about setbacks Kincardine council approved for the project last week and asked to see the county’s file on the Enbridge project.

The planning department has done a good job, Mattmer said, but he wants information on how it arrived at its recommendations.

“The county planning have done an excellent job here, it’s just that we on the outside don’t know the basis for the decisions that have been made,” Mattmer said. “That’s what I’m looking for; some assurance here.”

That assurance would come by knowing decisions were based on sound technological science, he said.

Planners’ views aren’t always the same views as residents have, Mattmer told council.

“From the outside you send your letters in, you attend meetings, you make your comments, but you don’t know how they’re evaluated on the inside,” he said.

“So the decisions don’t always meet your expectations and you don’t know why.”

Setbacks recommended by Bruce County’s planning department and approved by council are less than those in other counties, and Mattmer said that points to the need for province-wide regulations.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky