[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Town objects new wind farm  

pinchercreekecho.com

By Ben Curties

Town of Pincher Creek councillors have strongly objected to a proposal for a wind farm between the town’s northern boundaries and Highway 3.

The councillors felt the wind farm would block the Town’s planned expansion route.

“The bottom line is we need room for future growth,” Councillor Ernie Olsen said.

The “Four Corners Wind Farm” development, proposed by ABKO Holdings and 70 Holdings Company, would involve land south of Highway 3, east of Highway 6 and west of Highway 785 on the fringes of Pincher Station within approximately 1.6 kilometres of the Pincher Creek town boundary.

Town Chief Administrative Officer Fran Kornfeld said towns are expected to have 20-50 years of land expansion plans.

A 2003 intermunicipal development plan between the Town and Municipal District of Pincher Creek identifies land north of town as appropriate urban lands for annexation and expansion, and the Town says the plan should be expanded due to a June 10, 2005 annexation.

“The placement of windmills directly between the northern boundaries of the Town of Pincher Creek would either eliminate or severely limit any future expansion to the north,” a Town Council briefing reads.

With intensive livestock operations to the west and the Hamlet of Lowland heights to the east, the Town sees the north as an obvious direction to expand, especially as new business would be close to Highway 3.

The Town cites blocked sightlines, noise pollution, airport traffic and an impact on wildlife and birds in a planned storm water marsh project as other potential concerns.

Councillors also wanted to change a proposed Sept. 20 intermunicipal meeting date on the subject.

The MD, which scheduled the meeting, hopes to bring representatives from both councils together with development reps Allan Kettles and Tom Golden.

The Town councillors also expressed reservations about having a proposed “tourist turbine” in town boundaries, which they dubbed “Big Bertha”.

They suggested that since wind farms pay the MD a lot in taxes, a tourist turbine could be located in the MD, possibly in the Kettles wind farm.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter