LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Huffing and puffing 

www.libn.com

By Jean Paul Vellotti

LINDENHURST ““ The Long Island Power Authority’s proposed offshore wind park has some tough critics, but Babylon Town Supervisor Steve Bellone may be tops.

The supervisor is accusing FPL Energy ““ builder of the proposed facility ““ of evading a comprehensive environmental review by the Minerals Management Service, the federal agency that has the power to permit the project.

“If this project moves forward it will permanently industrialize our coastline and potentially cause far-reaching environmental consequences,” Bellone said in a release prior to a public announcement this morning at Babylon Town Hall.

Bellone called FPL the Halliburton of wind power, adding FPL is avoiding the “kind of comprehensive analysis and regulation that this project demands.”

FPL has said that the project doesn’t require site specific environmental studies and that it can self-regulate itself.

Further, Bellone claims that FPL has said it alone should collect wind data, and that it doesn’t have to share the information with the government.

FPL did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

In a statement, LIPA said it “supports a complete environmental review off the proposed off-shore wind project. Given the all-time record breaking electric usage this summer, should we have a wind project on Long Island or continue to send our money to Big Oil or OPEC?”

In documents filed with the MMS, FPL said that field studies at the proposed location would be “hazardous and safety must be paramount.”

Bellone shot back, asking why it would be safe to build and operate a facility in this area.

“The stakes are too high with this project to allow a company like FPL to skate through the environmental review process,” said Bellone.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky