[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm objectors allege plan prejudged  


A Lawyer acting for windfarm objectors has accused council planners of severe malpractice, alleging they have twice prejudged the outcome of public hearings into a proposed development on Skye.

Giovanni di Stefano, whose previous clients have included Saddam Hussein and Harold Shipman, makes the claim in a letter to Communities Minister Malcolm Chisholm.

The letter, on behalf of the Skye Windfarm Action Group (Swag), also alleges that the Scottish Executive has colluded in malpractice surrounding the bid by power giant Amec to build 27 turbines at Edinbane.

It claims the council appeared to predetermine the outcome of a 2002 hearing and is preparing to do the same again in October.

Acceptance of the scheme in 2002 was later overturned following legal advice to the council amid concerns about litigation in the event of peat-slide and possible risk to the local eagle population.

The letter to Mr Chisholm was accompanied by copies of documents which are said to substantiate the claims, including correspondence from Amec and Highland Council planning director John Rennilson.

It claims: “It is clear that permission to connect to the grid prior to the collection of the bird data or peat-slide report indicates that planning permission was a foregone conclusion.

“The executive is colluding with Highland Council in its attempt to predetermine the Edinbane application prior to the period of public consultation or the public hearing.”

Swag chairman John Hodgson said: “We believe this shows that Highland Council cannot be trusted to determine this or any other windfarm application in an open and transparent manner.”

Mr Rennilson said: “It doesn’t raise any new issue. There’s a new committee compared with 2002 and they will deal with it as a fresh application.”

He said the objectors were legitimate to raise issues concerning peat stability and bird-strike.

Asked if he categorically denied that the Edinbane application had been predetermined, Mr Rennilson said: “Yes, absolutely.”

David Hodkinson, managing director of Amec’s wind-energy business, said Swag appeared “desperate to besmirch the reputations of all who dare disagree with its anti-windfarm agenda”.

Police are investigating Swag’s claims about the Edinbane plan.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.