[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Battle for turbines to carry on  

Bosses at a North-East drug company last night vowed to continue their fight to erect two giant wind turbines in a bid to cut their energy costs.

Aesica Pharmaceuticals’ planning application to build the two 140-metre-high turbines at their factory in Cramlington, Northumberland, was yesterday turned down by Blyth Valley Borough Council’s development control panel.

The company says the green energy resource will reduce its £407,000-a-year electricity bill by around 40%, making it more efficient and protecting the jobs of its 165 employees. However, planning officers recommended councillors refuse the application – after Newcastle Airport objected on air safety grounds.

Airport managers say the two turbines, which would cost £3.5m to set up, will interfere with the airport’s radar system.

They argue air traffic controllers will be at risk of not being able to distinguish between the turbines and aircraft.

Adam Simms, finance director at Aesica, which make active pharmaceutical ingredients, said after last night’s meeting: “We are disappointed but it is not entirely unexpected. I think we will appeal against it. We have tried to talk to the airport about the turbines in the past and we are prepared to do so again.

“The turbines would help us reduce our energy bill by half, and increase our chances of sustaining employment on the Cramlington site.”

Newcastle and Gateshead branch of Friends of the Earth wrote to the council supporting Aesica’s application and a number of councillors voted last night to defer the decision.

Newcastle Airport’s planning development and facilities manager Graeme Mason said before yesterday’s meeting: “Our objection is based on the turbines creating line-of-sight issues to the airport’s radar and that they could impact on operations at the airport.”


By Rhodri Phillips, The Journal

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.