[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy controversy grows  

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," Dave Groberg, project developer for Invenergy Wind LLC told 60 members of Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy (MCRE) Tuesday at Williamsburg’s community center. "While many people find wind turbines graceful and attractive, others disagree." He was referring to the 131 wind turbines his Chicago-based company hopes to erect on the mountain ridges of northwestern Greenbrier County.

Groberg took issue with several assertions made by MCRE members last week as reported in this newspaper. He said the 20 permanent jobs created will not be minimum wage jobs, but will pay an average of $35,000 with benefits. He insisted the towers would not adversely affect the availability of any land that is currently available for hunting, fishing, or recreation.

He said the nearest residence to the project would be more than one mile away, and that the majority would be four miles distance. He said wind farms have fostered dramatic growth in tourism.

Groberg asserted that at 5,000 feet there is virtually no way residents will hear auditory evidence of a turbine. He assured that no endangered species had been sighted in the project area.

County resident John Stroud presented the views of author and energy expert Eric Rosenbloom. "On a small scale," Rosenbloom explains, "where a turbine directly supplies the users and the fluctuating production can be stored, wind can contribute to a home, school, factory, office building, or even small village’s electricity. But this simply does not work on a large scale to supply the grid. Even the small benefits claimed by their promoters are far outstripped by the huge negative impacts.

"It is wise to diversify the sources of our energy. But the money and legislative effort invested in large-scale wind generation could be spent much more effectively to achieve the goal of reducing our use of fossil and nuclear fuels … Wind farms do not bring about any reduction in the use of conventional power plants.

"Because of the intermittency and variability of the wind, conventional power plants must be kept running at full capacity to meet the actual demand for electricity. Most cannot simply be turned on and off as the wind dies and rises, and the quick ramping up and down of those that can would actually increase the output of pollution.

"In hilly areas (such as Greenbrier County), many existing roads are inadequate for getting all the equipment into the area — huge tower sections and rotor blades. Erosion, disruption of water flow, destruction of wild habitat and plant life would continue with the presence of access roads, power lines, transformers, the tower sites themselves. Each tower requires trees to be cleared. Vegetation would be kept down with herbicides, further poisoning the soil and water.

"The energy companies claim that they increase the local tax base. But that is more than offset by the loss of open land, the loss of tourism, the stagnation or decrease in property values, the tax credits they enjoy, the taxes and fees consumers must pay to subsidize the industry. Even surveys by wind promoters show that a quarter to a third of visitors would no longer come if turbines are installed. That is a huge loss in areas that depend on tourism.

"Wind power stations are not parks. They are industrial and commercial installations. They do not belong in wilderness areas. It makes no sense to tackle one environmental problem by creating another."


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.