[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Better energy plan  

What Vermont is lacking,
however, is leadership on the controversial matter of wind turbines on
mountain tops. The state’s ridgelines are the wrong place to put
330-foot-tall wind towers.

Common sense dictates that energy planning focus on conservation and
cleaner sources of power. For that reason alone, the Senate energy bill
ought to prevail in Congress as both chambers hammer out a compromise plan.

Vermont U.S. Sens. Patrick Leahy and Jim Jeffords support the Senate
version, which was approved Tuesday by a solid bipartisan majority.

The bill includes funding for programs to reduce overall energy
consumption, as well as incentives to boost renewable and clean power
sources. For example, the measure includes a tax incentive for consumers
who purchase fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles. These are forward-thinking
measures.

The Senate plan has its critics who argue it doesn’t go far enough. But
the House-passed bill did not include many of these important provisions
and should not be the final blueprint.

The timing of this debate is important. The price of regular unleaded
gas in Vermont has topped $2 a gallon. Therefore, holding down
consumption is vital. In addition, national security issues make it
clear that America’s reliance on foreign oil ought to be reduced.

Finally, promoting new, innovative energy sources creates jobs.

Vermont is ahead of the game on this front, with the Legislature passing
a renewable energy incentives bill this year. What Vermont is lacking,
however, is leadership on the controversial matter of wind turbines on
mountain tops. The state’s ridgelines are the wrong place to put
330-foot-tall wind towers. Gov. Jim Douglas and legislators must take
control of this issue and find solutions as the state moves forward with
its planning.

Talks between the U.S. House and Senate on a final energy bill are
expected to be contentious, and might end – as they have in the past —
in gridlock.

That would be a shame.

Editorial Staff

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter