LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dr Iser conducts survey on wind power station effects 

Credit:  The Mirror, Wednesday, November 17, 2004 ~~

Promontory district medical practitioner and South Gippsland Shire Medical Officer of Health Dr David Iser has conducted his own confidential survey on the health effects of living near a wind power station.

Dr Iser said he was prompted to undertake such a study because “it has been brought to my attention that there may be adverse health effects caused to people living in close proximity to wind power stations.

“A literature review of studies overseas has shown that while there are no proven significant adverse health effects of a physical nature, there certainly has been documented cases of annoyance resulting in reduced wellbeing,” he said.

“To my knowledge there has been no other studies done on this subject in Australia, and with this in mind I prepared and distributed 25 questionnaires.”

Dr Iser’s survey was sent to households located within about two kilometres of Stanwell Corporation Limited’s 12-turbine wind power station on Silcocks Hill at Toora.

The survey asked the people who received the survey to provide their name and address if they wished, as well as to give an indication of their age group.

They were also asked to state the distance between their property and the nearest wind turbine, how long they had been living at the property, and whether they felt their health had been “adversely affected since the erection of the turbines”.

Those respondents who thought their health had been adversely affected were asked to state whether they had experienced an increase of a number of symptoms since the turbines were built.

The list of symptoms Dr Iser sought information about included headaches, palpitations, excessive tiredness, stress, anxiety, tinnitus or ringing in the ears, hearing problems, sleep disturbances, migraines, depression or any other related condition.

Respondents were asked to state whether they had approached their doctor in regard to any of these symptoms and to briefly describe any tests they may have undergone and/or treatment they may have received.

The final question on the survey asked respondents if they believed that “your quality of life has in any way altered since living near the wind turbines” and if so, how.

Survey Results

Dr Iser said 20, or 80 per cent, of the 25 surveys were returned to him during the six weeks after they were circulated.

The results of the survey were collated and analysed, with Dr Iser dividing the information into three categories; no health problems, minor health problems and major health problems.

Dr Iser said 12 of the 20 respondents reported no health problems whatsoever.

A further five people reported mild health problems, including disturbed sleep, especially on quiet nights, anxiety, stress and concerns about property values.

Three people reported major health problems, including sleep disturbances, stress and dizziness, which required investigation, treatment and medication.

“Overall, 12 of the 20 respondents showed no health problems, while eight out of 20 showed mild to major problems mostly related to sleep disturbance and stress,” Dr Iser said.

“I would be interested in hearing from other people who may not have received my survey who think their health has been either unaffected or adversely affected because of living near a wind power station.”

Download scan of original article: “Dr Iser conducts survey on wind power station effectsMirror-041117-Iser-wind-survey”

Source:  The Mirror, Wednesday, November 17, 2004

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky