Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of carbon crediting projects
Author: | Emissions
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Abstract—
Carbon markets play an important role in firms’ and governments’ climate strategies. Carbon crediting mechanisms allow project developers to earn carbon credits through mitigation projects. Several studies have raised concerns about environmental integrity, though a systematic evaluation is missing. We synthesized studies relying on experimental or rigorous observational methods, covering 14 studies on 2346 carbon mitigation projects and 51 studies investigating similar field interventions implemented without issuing carbon credits. The analysis covers one-fifth of the credit volume issued to date, almost 1 billion tons of CO2e. We estimate that less than 16% of the carbon credits issued to the investigated projects constitute real emission reductions, with 11% for cookstoves, 16% for SF6 destruction, 25% for avoided deforestation, 68% for HFC-23 abatement, and no statistically significant emission reductions from wind power and improved forest management projects. Carbon crediting mechanisms need to be reformed fundamentally to meaningfully contribute to climate change mitigation.
Benedict S. Probst, Malte Toetzke, Andreas Kontoleon, Laura Díaz Anadón, Jan C. Minx, Barbara K. Haya, Lambert Schneider, Philipp A. Trotter, Thales A. P. West, Annelise Gill-Wiehl & Volker H. Hoffmann
Net Zero Lab, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Germany.
Group for Sustainability and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Land Economy, Centre for Environment, Energy, and Natural Resource Governance, University of Cambridge, UK.
Public Policy for the Green Transition, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany.
Priestley International Centre for Climate, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK.
Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Öko-Institut, Berlin, Germany.
Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Germany.
Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, UK.
Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Energy & Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Nature Communications volume 15, Article number: 9562 (2024)
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53645-z
Download original document: “Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of carbon crediting projects”
This material is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this material resides with the author(s). As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Queries e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share:
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy