Motion to stay or remand the appeal and motion for extension of time to respond to the Permittee’s cross-motion for summary judgment

Author: Ridge Protectors | Environment, Filings, Vermont

Translate: FROM English | TO English

For the reasons stated herein, the Appellants respectfully request that this Court 1) remand or stay the appeal of the Discharge Permit pending ANR’s [Agency of Natural Resources] issuance of an amended Discharge Permit, and 2) extend the deadline for filing responses to the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment until at least two weeks after a decision on this motion is issued should the Court deny the motion, or indefinitely should the Court grant the motion.

Download original document: “Appellants’ motion to stay or remand the appeal and motion for extension of time to respond to the Permittee’s cross-motion for summary judgment”

This material is the work of the author(s) indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this material resides with the author(s). As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Queries e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions

(via Stripe)

(via Paypal)

Share:

[ Short URLs: https://wind-watch.org/doc/?p=1238 | http://wndfo.net/D1238 ]