[ posts only (not attachments) ]


[ exact phrase in "" ]

ISSUES/LOCATIONS

View titles only
List all documents, ordered…

By Title

By Author

Randomly (Washington)

View PDF, DOC, PPT, and XLS files on line

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

RSS

Add NWW documents to your site (click here)

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.
View titles only

List all documents, ordered … By Title | By Author

Browse Washington (list in random order)

Resource Documents: Washington (14 items)

RSSWashington

Unless indicated otherwise, documents presented here are not the product of nor are they necessarily endorsed by National Wind Watch. Nor should it be implied that the sources and writers endorse National Wind Watch. These resource documents are shared here to assist anyone wishing to research the issue of industrial wind power and the impacts of its development. The information should be evaluated by each reader to come to their own conclusions about the many areas of debate. • The copyrights reside with the sources indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations.


Date added:  May 24, 2013
Environment, Regulations, WashingtonPrint storyE-mail story

Reply Brief to Whistling Ridge Application

Author:  Friends of the Columbia Gorge; Save Our Scenic Area

REPLY TO STATEMENTS OF THE CASE The Applicant argues that it “stipulated that no more than 38 turbines would be constructed” as part of the Project. WRE Br. at 5. This is incorrect, because the Applicant never proposed a 38-turbine project in compliance with EFSEC’s mandatory procedures. Instead, the proposal reviewed below was the 50-turbine proposal in the Application. The Applicant, citing a letter written by its company president, Jason Spadaro, asserts that it “conducted more . . . wildlife . . .

More »


Date added:  December 11, 2011
Impacts, WashingtonPrint storyE-mail story

Compilation of documents by KROWS

Author:  Kittitas Residents Opposing Windfarm Sprawl

Kittitas Residents Opposing Windfarm Sprawl (KROWS) have collected the following documents on their web site. Post-Construction Bat and Bird Fatality Study at the Blue Sky Green Field Wind Energy Center, Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin Economic Importance of Bats in Agriculture False Claims that “Wind Farms” Provide Large Economic and Job Benefits Think Twice: Why Wind Power Mandates Are Wrong for the Northwest True Cost of Electricity from Wind Is Always Underestimated and Its Value Is Always Overestimated Wind Turbine . . .

More »


Date added:  December 17, 2009
Filings, Health, Noise, WashingtonPrint storyE-mail story

Prefiled testimony of David Lipscomb before Washington state EFSEC

Author:  Lipscomb, David

Q: Are you familiar with the effects of noise on public health? Ans: Yes. In addition to my work with the U. S. EPA, I have attended and made presentations to numerous International Congresses on Noise as a Public Health Problem. They include 1968 (Washington, D.C.); 1973 (Dubrovnic, Yugoslavia); 1978 (Friburg, Germany) and 1982 (Turin, Italy). These were gatherings of active researchers on the topic from around the world. Proceedings of the Congresses were produced and are contained in my . . .

More »


Date added:  March 7, 2009
Grid, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, WashingtonPrint storyE-mail story

Very Low Wind Generation Period of Jan-09, and a 1-Year Lookback at Frequency of Very Low Wind Gen Periods

Author:  Bonneville Power Authority

The very low wind generation period of Jan-09 has ended, after: • more than 11-1/2 continuous days with total wind gen <50 MW: 14-Jan-09 02:43:00 thru 25-Jan-09 17:13:00 (11 days, 14.5 hours); and • more than 8-1/2 continuous days <10 MW: 14-Jan-09 16:59:00 thru 23-Jan-09 07:37:00 (8 days, 14.6 hours) How often in the past year have we seen others periods of “very low” wind generation? The next plot shows the Percent of Time by Week Where Total Wind Gen Was <50 MW over the last 56 . . .

More »


« Later DocumentsHomeEarlier Documents »

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Bluesky Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab