Resource Documents by Ridge Protectors
Ridge Protectors
Motion to stay or remand the appeal and motion for extension of time to respond to the Permittee’s cross-motion for summary judgment
For the reasons stated herein, the Appellants respectfully request that this Court 1) remand or stay the appeal of the Discharge Permit pending ANR’s [Agency of Natural Resources] issuance of an amended Discharge Permit, and 2) extend the deadline for filing responses to the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment until at least two weeks after a decision on this motion is issued should the Court deny the motion, or indefinitely should the Court grant the motion. Download original document: “Appellants’ motion . . . Complete article »
Ridge Protectors
Motion to require amended application
The filing by Vermont Wind on December 23, 2008 (“December 2008 Amendment”), involves numerous substantial changes which not only have the potential for a “significant impact” with respect to a number of Section 248(b) criteria but in many instances demonstrably will cause such impacts. Vermont Wind, well aware that its newly configured project will trigger the provisions of Board Rule 5.408, attempts to avoid this inevitable result by attaching a number of perfunctory, and technically indefensible, conclusory assertions from its . . . Complete article »
Also try:
Search all of documents for "Ridge Protectors".
Search entire site for "Ridge Protectors".
