Categories

Alerts Home
Archives

  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • ALL
    RSS

    Add NWW Alerts to your site (click here)

    Sign up for daily updates

    Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

    Donate $10

    Donate $5

    News Watch

    Selected Documents

    All Documents

    Research Links

    Press Releases

    FAQs

    Publications & Products

    Photos & Graphics

    Videos

    Allied Groups

    Source:  Rhoda Bryan

    Please Oppose Delaware Off-Shore Windfarming  

    Source:  Rhoda Bryan | Delaware, Letters

    I am writing you and asking you to please oppose the proposed Delaware off-shore wind farming project. I don’t support off-shore or on-shore wind farms at this point in time.

    I went to the 7-40 meeting last night at the Bear Library, and I am convinced for now that the over-all effects of such Wind Farms outweigh the benefits for the following reasons:

    1. High cost that outweighs the benefits.
    2. Cost and size of infrastructure and the habitat this project will gobble up; plus, more human activity (fishing, etc) will be invited into this disrupted habitat area for recreation. Human recreation puts a lot of pressure on wild-life and habitat (pollution, littering, over-fishing and other destructive activities).
    3. Any large project invades and uses up large areas of habitat (whether terrestial, ocean bottom or other-wise). What in-water, under-water and bottom-dwelling wild-life use this area for migration ?
    4. Developers and others will use the wind farms as an excuse to put in more development along the shore which will destroy more habitat and create more pressures on wild fauna.
    5. IF the global warming crisis is real, how are the wind farm structures going to stand up to higher seas from increased glacial melt, and who’s going to care about the wind farms if people along low-lying areas suddenly have to move in-land ?
    6. As for habitat mitigation, I don’t believe that Wind Farms or piles of old tires create artificial reefs. The tire venture has already been proven to be a stupid dismal failure (just someone’s idea of getting rid of old tires in a sly underhanded passive-aggressive way).
    7. I don’t think any grass-root groups such as River-Keepers, and others, will be allowed to monitor other possible/unknown-at-this-time consequences of how these wind farms might affect habitat, wild life. etc.
    8. If wind farms are so great then why are there on-line web-sites where environmentalists and naturalists oppose them ?

    I do appreciate that there are concerns about the upward swing of the price of oil and auto fuel. Wind Farms are not going to address fuel prices. It is more important to figure out how to remake the auto, and change from a gas-oil consuming combustion engine to something far cleaner (supposedly fuel cells, etc).

    I do support more green innovative ideas, but I don’t support large structures that sprawl over large tracts of land/water/habitat. I do urge you to encourage technology that will enable homeowners to have small, efficient energy producers on, or within their own property/structures, that do not harm humans, wildlife, habitat, air or water quality. That technology can’t be too far away.

    Sincerely,

    Rhoda Bryan, Delaware

    Wind Watch relies entirely
    on User Funding
    Donate $5 PayPal Donate

    Share:

    Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

    Wind Watch on Facebook

    Share

    CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    Share

    Wind Watch on Facebook

    Follow Wind Watch on Twitter