LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Power plan passed on ancient pilgrim site 

Credit:  By MICHAEL MCGLADE | Published on Saturday 17 November 2012 14:37 | News Letter | www.newsletter.co.uk ~~

A controversial wind turbine plan in the Sperrin Mountains has been given the green light, despite objectors claiming it is a site of ancient religious pilgrimage.

Earlier this week, it was revealed that the Planning Service has approved the single turbine which will be sited close to Lough Patrick, outside Draperstown in Co Londonderry.

A campaign to prevent the erection has been ongoing since 2007.

It has been claimed that the turbine plan which was put forward by a local cross-community partnership could bring in as much as £30,000 a year.

However, campaigners say the lough has been a place of Christian worship for more than 1,000 years and the turbine will destroy the site.

The application has sparked division in Magherafelt council, with Sinn Fein and the SDLP opposing the wind turbine.

SDLP councillor Kate Lagan said she was “deeply disappointed” and claimed the views of the objectors had not been addressed.

“First of all, the uniqueness of Lough Patrick has been ignored. Secondly, at another level, all decisions should be made taking into account local wishes and anxieties. These too were ignored,” said the councillor.

“Only in Northern Ireland would there be such complacent acceptance of at least the possible alteration for all time of a centuries-old historical site without public discussion.

“It argues an inadequate understanding of and failure to embrace the past of all of us and a blithe refusal to consider the result for posterity.

“The religious implications of the turbine do not seem important. Will posterity ask the question why did they have to put it just there?”

Ms Lagan said they had not given up hope.

“We have until December 11 to get a final submission, but we are going to give it our best shot.”

Source:  By MICHAEL MCGLADE | Published on Saturday 17 November 2012 14:37 | News Letter | www.newsletter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon