LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge to decide fate of Fairhaven’s north turbine 

Credit:  By ARIEL WITTENBERG | November 5, 2012 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

FAIRHAVEN – The fate of Fairhaven’s north wind turbine now rests with Superior Court Judge Lloyd Macdonald following a hearing on a motion that could result in the turbine’s removal.

Twenty-three members of Windwise, a group opposing the town’s two turbines, filed suit against Fairhaven in December, alleging that the north turbine’s lease is “invalid.”

“The May 2007 Town Meeting specifically authorized the selectmen to sign the lease for one turbine on Lot 8 and one turbine on Lot 8A,” Windwise attorney Ann DeNardis said. “The north turbine was placed on Lot 9, which was never authorized by specific vote.”

At the Oct. 25 motion hearing, DeNardis decided to forgo a jury trial and asked Macdonald to decide the turbine’s fate.

Macdonald has yet to render a decision on the issue, something DeNardis said could take weeks.

If the judge finds in Windwise’s favor, “the turbine would have to be taken down and Lot 9 would have to be restored to its original condition before trees on the land were cut,” DeNardis said.

Town Counsel Thomas Crotty did not respond to requests for comment.

DeNardis said that if the north turbine were taken down, it would “not be easy” for it to be erected on the approved lot 8A because there would have to be another wetlands review.

She said she was optimistic that the judge would rule in Windwise’s favor, but that if he did not, “I can appeal it to a higher court.”

“If someone is dissatisfied with a verdict, you always have that option,” she said. “But for now, we are just waiting.”

Source:  By ARIEL WITTENBERG | November 5, 2012 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon