| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Family of man killed in air crash files suit
Credit: By Paul Burgarino/ Contra Costa Times | 10/31/2012 | www.thereporter.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
MARTINEZ – The family of a pilot killed in a 2011 plane crash on a Delta island is suing those responsible for building the meteorological tower his airplane struck, saying it was purposely built to avoid federal regulations for making such structures more visible.
Agricultural pilot Stephen Allen was killed on Webb Tract in Contra Costa County on Jan. 10, 2011, after his airplane struck a 198-foot tower that he likely did not see, according to the National Transportation Safety Board.
Federal law requires that meteorological towers taller than 200 feet be painted in bright aviation colors and lit.
NRG Systems “willfully, intentionally and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others” chose to install the tower without markings, paint, lights, cable balls or devices to enhance visibility, according to a lawsuit filed last November in Sacramento County Superior Court by Allen’s wife Karen and daughters Angela Lucero and Gail Back.
“Steve ran an agricultural business and had been flying for more than 25 years and by all accounts was a great guy, so from that perspective, the loss is incalculable,” said Roger Dreyer, the attorney representing the Allen family.
The family is seeking an unspecified amount in compensatory and punitive damages, Dreyer said.
NRG denies all of the allegations, and says that Allen’s own carelessness was “concurrently and comparatively negligent” or at fault in the crash, attorney Craig Livingston said in response to
the complaint. Further, Allen knew the risks and hazards in the area, he said.
Property owners Delta Wetlands Properties and ZKS Real Estate Partners LLC and tower installers Western Development and Storage LLC, Shah and Associates Inc. and Bouldin Farming Co. were also named as defendants for allowing the tower to be erected and knowing the possible risks and location of the tower, according to the suit.
Attorneys for those groups did not return phone calls seeking comment.
The case was transferred to Contra Costa County Superior Court earlier this year. A case-management conference is planned for early January.
Experts say wind energy companies build towers under the 200-foot federal threshold so that they can prevent competitors from learning their whereabouts through the federal permitting process.
The risk to agricultural pilots is an “intentional circumstance,” Dreyer said.
“(The lawsuit) is about accountability,” he said.
Prompted by Allen’s crash, California legislators approved a bill this summer that requires that all such towers 50 feet and taller built after Jan. 1, 2013, be clearly marked with thick stripes of orange and white paint, orange tracking balls attached to each support wire, and clear marking on the ground where the wires are anchored.
It is optional for lights to be placed at the highest point of each tower.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=29591 ]
