[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Open letter to the Premier of South Australia re. new survey at Waterloo wind farm in April 2012  

Credit:  Mary Morris | Mid North Wind Farm Awareness ~~

Dear Premier Weatherill:

I have written to you previously about continuing problems in my community from the Waterloo wind farm and about Frank Wang’s disputed survey of the 75 households within 5 km of the Waterloo wind farm.

You wrote to me that you had asked Dr Melissa Nursey-Bray to provide copies of her correspondence with me.

I wonder what the outcome of that was?

In the end, as the results of Frank Wang’s survey (see attachment : Evaluation of wind farm policies) were disputed by the University and he has decided not to release them, and I have been unable to interest any other independent organizations in repeating Frank’s survey, I decided to repeat his survey myself.

I am aware that this will be seen as biased, but as no-one else seems willing to investigate what is going on, I have undertaken my survey to show that there is a problem which needs to be taken seriously and investigated.

Because I personally know people who are genuinely affected at significant distances from the turbines, I extended the survey area to approximately 10 km from the wind farm.

My aim was to survey every household within 10 km which was achieved by posting and hand delivering to letter boxes and post office boxes.

230 surveys were sent out in April 2012. 93 were returned. This was a 40% response rate.

46 respondents (49%) were negatively affected by some or all of : noise, shadow flicker, sleep deprivation, interference.

Another 17 respondents said they noticed the above effects and/or that the effects varied with weather but they were not affected.

The remaining 30 respondents said they were not affected. Some of these were turbine hosts.

I have attached my submission to the Select Committee on Wind Power in SA which includes a summary of my survey of all households within a range of around 10 km from Waterloo Wind Farm (93/230 households responded).

I have also provided the results for 0-5 km (41/75 households responded).

At both of these distances my results indicate that the current planning rules which allow wind farms to be built within 1 km of farmers homes are manifestly inadequate and not based on the physical realities of bigger and bigger turbines.

Noise Pollution Governance in SA is failing the people. The EPA guidelines only require measuring of dBA which is not the whole picture.

Whatever component of the sound spectrum is driving people out of their homes and depriving them of sleep needs to be measured and be part of the guidelines as well.

The turbines at Waterloo are causing sleep deprivation many nights a week, up to 10 km away.

The percentages of households affected by Electromagnetic interference , noise disturbance in the daytime and at night are far in excess of acceptable.

I am aware that the wind industry claims that smaller turbines have been in place in Europe for many years, but we are not dealing with the same scale or environment in the case of Waterloo wind farm.

Even with smaller turbines, local government authorities internationally are currently taking action against noise issues from wind developments to protect their communities.

These include Palmerston North Council in New Zealand (see Palmerston North City Council V NZ wind farms attachment and my summary notes)

And in Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA (see Board of Health Attachments).

When you have read my survey results, I ask you to please initiate further independent collaborative studies at Waterloo Wind farm with a view to scientifically establishing what is happening there and determine more appropriate setback distances and noise monitoring for existing and proposed wind turbine developments.

I look forward to hearing from you on this urgent matter.

Yours sincerely,
Mary Morris
PO Box 188
Ph 08 85811567
Mob 0438 066 634

Evaluation of Wind Farm Noise Policies in South Australia: Waterloo Case Study (see also here)
Waterloo Wind Farm Survey April 2012 – Select Committee
Waterloo Wind Farm Survey April 2012 – Part 2: Graphs
Falmouth Board of Health – Health Effects of Wind Turbines (also here)
Falmouth Board of Health request for health study (also here)
Waterloo Wind Farm Survey April 2012 – Select Committee
Palmerston North City Council v NZ Windfarms Ltd
Notes on Palmerston Nth Council v NZ Windfarms

Source:  Mary Morris | Mid North Wind Farm Awareness

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.