LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

VisitScotland supports ‘sensitive’ approach to windfarms 

Credit:  www.thecourier.co.uk 10 March 2012 ~~

Scotland’s national tourism organisation, VisitScotland, says it is not against the principle of windfarm development – despite fears from US billionaire Donald Trump that wind turbines will ”destroy landscapes” and will be ”seriously detrimental to Scotland’s fantastic tourism industry”.

The Courier asked VisitScotland to comment after a meeting in St Andrews last Thursday, during which Trump’s legal counsel and executive vice-president George Sorial expressed concern about the impact of windfarms.

Mr Trump, who has voiced opposition to proposals for 11 turbines off the Aberdeenshire coast, near his golf resort, has now turned his attention to saving Scotland from what he calls ”ugly monstrosities”.

He is planning to spend more than £10m campaigning against offshore windfarms and is to give evidence in the Scottish Parliament.

A VisitScotland spokesman told The Courier: ”VisitScotland understands and supports the drive for renewable energy and recognises the potential of Scotland’s vast resource. As a consequence, VisitScotland is not against the principle of wind farm development.

”When consulted as part of the formal planning process, VisitScotland recommends that tourism concerns are taken into account when granting planning permission, and encourages sensitive siting of developments.

”Ultimately, it is for the local planning authority or Scottish ministers to make the final decision.”

Source:  www.thecourier.co.uk 10 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon