Wind co-operation urged
Credit: By LYNN MOORE, The Gazette, www.canada.com 27 January 2010
MONTREAL – Interprovincial rivalry in the wind-energy sector won’t help develop Canadian expertise and export potential in a growth industry, according to manufacturers that would like a melding of local-content regulations for wind farms in Quebec and Ontario.
In Quebec, wind-farm developers must guarantee the expenditure of at least 60 per cent of total wind farm costs in the province while the comparable figure in Ontario will be – by 2012 – 50 per cent. The goal for each province is to create a home-grown supply chain, jobs and expertise.
But such manufactures as multinationals REpower Systems and Siemens Canada argue a stronger Canadian supply chain would be created if the sister provinces had a system whereby manufactures in one province got credits, or some sort of formal recognition, in the other.
“It would be beneficial for each province … and avoid duplication for manufacturers,” REpower’s Canadian director, Helmut Herold, said yesterday in an interview at an industry conference in Montreal.
His firm, which is to supply about 477 turbines to five Quebec wind farms, recently opened a sales office in Toronto, and Herold raised the issue last week with senior staff in Ontario’s department of economic development.
But Herold is not alone in wanting local-content rules harmonized between Quebec and Ontario. Other giants based in Germany, such as Siemens, which has a transformer plant in Trois Rivières, support the idea, as do industry newcomers such as Quebec-based turbine manufacturer AAER Inc.
The push for revamped local-content regulations will probably gain strength amid industry uncertainty generated by the $7-billion green energy pact Ontario signed with Samsung Group, industry insiders and observers say.
The Samsung pact, announced last week, “appears to have changed the rules of the game somewhat” for those wishing to do business in Ontario, the head of the Canadian Wind Energy Association said.
When Ontario implemented its Green Energy Act last October, it promised “open and equal access” to energy transmission lines as well as a guaranteed premium for green energy producers, association president Robert Hornung said. “This deal is inconsistent with a number of those principles,” he said.
The 20-year deal provides South Korea’s biggest conglomerate with initial access to 500 megawatts of transmission capacity on Ontario’s electricity grid, space that is currently limited and in high demand. Samsung’s access will increase to 2,500 MW over time, Hornung said. Reserving a large block of capacity for one developer “has made the remaining pie smaller for all developers,” he said.
As well as lots of capital, wind farms need access to transmission lines to take power to consumers. The Samsung deal has raised uncertainty as to how Ontario will make transmission reservations and investors are not comfortable with uncertainty, Hornung said.
“In Ontario, it is a very grey zone right now” with respect to how renewable energy projects will roll out, said Renaud Marc-Antoine, business and development manager for Enercon Canada Inc., which is also to build turbines for Quebec wind farms.
“In Quebec, the government is tough but the rules are extremely clear,” he said in an interview at an event organized by the Canadian German Chamber of Industry and Commerce.
A melding of local-content regulations in Quebec and Ontario would allow companies to enjoy economies of scale and “totally makes sense,” AAER’s chief financial officer, Eric Phaneuf, said in a telephone interview.
His firm, which also recently opened a sales office in Toronto, has a plant in Bromont “and it doesn’t make sense for us to duplicate that in every” province or state in which AAER wants to do business, he said.
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy
Some possibly related stories:
- ‘Unfair’ advantage cited in Samsung deal
- Samsung deal to bring wind, solar farms to Ontario: sources
- Samsung’s turbine deal in jeopardy; McGuinty stalls plan after cabinet uproar
- Minister’s exit won’t spell end of wind turbine tussle
- Critics warn Ont. government’s green energy deal with Samsung bad for taxpayers
- Samsung looking to build wind farm on north shore of Ontario’s Lake Erie
The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.
