Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Archive

Gamesa: Shaffer Mountain a priority

Nearly three years after a permit application to build a wind farm on Shaffer Mountain was filed with the state, the first shovel of dirt is yet to be turned.

The project could be the poster child for private advocacy – with nearly a thousand residents flooding a Department of Environmental Protection meeting in August 2007 to fight the construction and tens of thousands of dollars raised for the Save Our Mountain cause.

But Gamesa USA, the Spain-based company which plans the Somerset and Bedford counties wind facility said it is not backing down despite public opposition.

Gamesa’s interest in the project is as strong as its ever been, Alyssa Edwards, senior project developer said Friday.

“The Shaffer Mountain wind farm remains a priority for Gamesa,” Edwards said. “We are fully committed to the project and we believe the site is appropriate for this type of clean energy development.”

The company wants to build 30 turbines near the border with Bedford County in an area critics maintain has exceptional streams, endangered species and provides a migration corridor for prized raptors and birds.

Joe Cominsky, a Shaffer Mountain property owner, thinks the intense community involvement and opposition to the project is responsible for the delays.

“The whole Allegheny Front has been inundated with wind turbines. The only place they’ve been beaten back is Shaffer Mountain,” he said.

DEP has issued several letters citing deficiencies with the plan as part of the technical review, and Gamesa has responded, DEP spokeswoman Katy Gresh said.

Gamesa is seeking a required National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems permit as well as a Water Obstruction and Encroachment Permit.

The second permit is needed because of a proposed stream crossing.

“They look at any possible issue that could occur during construction,” Gresh said.

The most recent technical review letter went out the week of Nov. 20 and a response from Gamesa arrived at DEP last week.

“They are still responding,” Gresh said.

Edwards said Gamesa continues to work with various state and federal agencies and forwards the information the agencies need before deciding on the application.

“I will say this: This process showcases the very rigorous standards that go into permitting a wind farm in Pennsylvania,” Edwards said.

“Many who oppose wind farms claim the process is completely unregulated,” she said. “Shaffer Mountain proves that just the opposite is true.”

The farm is proposed for Shade and Ogle townships in Somerset County and Napier Township is Bedford County.

By KATHY MELLOTT

The Tribune-Democrat

www.tribune-democrat.com

6 December 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts