Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Archive

Inspector urged to scrap ‘speculative’ turbine proposals

Proposals for wind turbine developments were branded as purely commercial and speculative during the final day of evidence at a public inquiry.

The hearing into the schemes to build four turbines up to 100m high at Bickham Moor, near Oakford, and nine up to 105m high at Three Moors, Knowstone, was launched after developers Airtricity Ltd and Coronation Power appealed after North and Mid Devon district councils failed to decide on planning applications within a statutory timeframe.

Knowstone resident Richard Delf asked inspector Philip Major last Tuesday to dismiss the appeals, saying the Bickham Moor scheme “showed all the signs of having been cobbled together without any appreciation of the impact on the environment and local residents”.

The Three Moors scheme, he argued, was attempting to squeeze too many turbines onto a reduced plot of land, to maximise the financial return to Airtricity.

David Cocks QC, appearing for opposition group the Rural Exmoor Alliance, told the inquiry there was an unusual number of uncertainties in the case.

He asked: “How much noise will the turbines make? How much are we saving on emissions? The answers are no more than educated guesswork.”

Mr Cocks also questioned the amount of electricity that the turbines would produce.

Peter Wadsley, solicitor for Mid Devon District Council, said the authority believed the turbines would be at odds with the rural setting.

“These large, moving, industrial structures do not blend into the landscape but impose themselves on it,” he said.

The applicants had stressed the need for schemes such as these to help the Government meet renewable energy targets, but Mr Wadsley said the planning process still had to be adhered to.

“Applications made by developers should be in appropriate places, the council says this has not been done,” he said.

“If the council only receives applications which are sited in areas which are not appropriate, it follows that targets are unlikely to be met, but that is not the fault of the system or the council.”

William Morris QC outlined how Coronation Power had come to choose its site.

He said national and international policy was clear on the importance of moving towards reducing carbon emissions.

While Bickham was a relatively small project, it was nonetheless an important one, he said, adding that it was 6.5km, from Exmoor.

The inspector will consider the evidence before reporting in the New Year.

The Herald

www.thisisplymouth.co.uk

3 December 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts