Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Councillors to re-take decision on Halesworth turbines

Councillors in Waveney have opted to re-take a decision on a planning bid to build wind turbines near Halesworth that resulted in a councillor quitting his cabinet post.

Members of Waveney District Council were called to an extraordinary meeting to decide whether the application, which was refused, should be reconsidered.

Last month the council’s development control committee voted on an application by turkey giant Bernard Matthews to build five turbines on a former airfield in Holton. Councillor Chris Punt resigned as portfolio holder for finance following complaints that he broke council rules in voting on the decision because he had not declared he lived in the area, nor that he worked for a firm that could be affected by the outcome.

Councillors at the extraordinary meeting, that took place on Thursday, November 12, agreed with the recommendations of the monitoring officer that the decision be revoked and re-considered at the next available development control committee meeting. It is not known whether it will be on the agenda for the next meeting on Wednesday.

Yesterday both sides supported the outcome. A spokesman for Bernard Matthews said: “We welcome the decision taken by Waveney District Council to ask the planning committee to look at our application again.”

Adrian Simpson-James, co-ordinator of opposition group Westhall Wind Watch, said: “The district council made the most sensible decision possible under the circumstances. Above all, in referring the application back to the development control committee, they demonstrated their trust in the members of the committee to continue to act in a proper and professional manner.

“We remain confident that the facts surrounding the application will lead to the right decision being made. Plans revealed recently for a huge expansion in offshore wind farms around our region confirm our assertion that small-scale onshore wind farms like the ones proposed by Bernard Matthews are unnecessary and irrelevant; the damage they do to the local area and its people greatly outweighs the tiny contribution they might make to the country’s renewable energy needs. The weight of argument against this wind farm will win the day.”

Beccles and Bungay Journal

www.becclesandbungayjournal.co.uk

14 November 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts