Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Counties support new power line for San Luis Valley

ALAMOSA — A proposed $180 million high-voltage transmission line into the San Luis Valley picked up support Tuesday night from the county commissions of San Luis, Rio Grande and Saguache counties.

In testimony at a Colorado Public Utilities Commission hearing, commissioners for each county backed the line, which has drawn criticism from some landowners and conservation groups.

“We are in favor of the transmission line and more solar energy in the valley,” San Luis County Commissioner Darius Allen said.

The line is expected to ensure electricity supplies to power the 3,000 sprinklers used by valley farms.

“If we have the power interrupted, it would be devastating,” Allen said.

Rio Grande County Commissioner Doug Davie said that losing power on a 120-acre sprinkler could curb a potato yield by seven sacks an acre per day, worth about $5,400.

“That’s sizeable for a farmer,” Davie said.

The proposal for the 146-mile transmission line is being made by Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and Xcel Energy.

Tri-State executives say the line — from Pueblo to Walsenburg to Alamosa — is needed to provide reliable electricity to the valley, which is served by three lines over Poncha Pass.

Xcel says the line also will help send solar and wind energy to the Front Range.

The proposed line, however, would cross La Veta Pass, and its 150-foot towers would dot pristine valleys and mountains as it passes by Great Sand Dunes National Park.

The line also traverses areas designated by the state as prime areas for wind and solar power.

“The cart has been put before the horse. We are discussing routes before the many alternatives have been researched,” Fort Garland resident Sally Keller said.

Last week, the utilities changed the preferred route after it was found their maps failed to note about 50 homes.

The federal Rural Electric Service, which is financing part of the project, announced it would do a full environmental impact statement of the project.

Initially, the service had planned to do a less-rigorous environmental assessment.

Supporters are confusing the issue, said Chris Canally, director of the San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council.

“They haven’t proven the need,” he said.

By Mark Jaffe

The Denver Post

www.denverpost.com

11 November 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts