Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Not in anyone’s back yard

There was a very interesting forum held at the West Rutland town hall on Oct. 22. Three speakers presented information that should cause anyone to think very hard about whether an industrial wind “farm” in their community is a good thing. Or whether it’s even useful to meet Vermont’s renewable energy goals.

Most people realize that the 40 proposed towers (taller than the Bennington battle monument) and turbines (big as a bus) will radically impact the view of the highest peaks of western Rutland County. Day and night.

What they may not know is that there can be health problems. Insomnia. Heart irregularities. Stress-induced disease. In the Netherlands, it’s called the new Dutch disease; in Japan it’s called wind turbine disease. At some wind projects, they’ve been severe enough to make developers “buy out” nearby families who cannot stay in their homes. To get the payment, they have to sign a “gag” agreement so they can’t talk about their stories.

There is evidence that low-frequency noise, the kind that shakes your house, and your body, without you hearing it, is increased when the things are placed on mountaintops and ridgelines with valleys below.

There is anecdotal evidence that when a wind “farm” moves in, the hunt-able wildlife moves out.

This should be a wake-up call to everyone in Ira, Clarendon, Middletown, West Rutland, Poultney, indeed, all of the county. This project is targeted at our community because one large out-of-state landowner happens to own 4,000 acres of mountaintop and wants to generate revenue. It’s backed by a huge Italian conglomerate. They will reap the benefits. Not Rutland County, despite the meager payments to host towns, which will not compensate for the loss of value to real property, nor the harm to those directly in the path of the blades.

It isn’t a case of NIMBY. It’s NIABY (not in anyone’s backyard). These machines should be sited where people aren’t, if at all. In fact, there’s good evidence they won’t even contribute to the solution of carbon dioxide because they only produce at a small fraction of rated capacity, and least of all when it’s needed most.

Get the facts at www.stopillwind.org or www.vce.org.

GREG ULLSTROM

Clarendon

Rutland Herald

www.rutlandherald.com

7 November 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts