Double standard troubles
The new wind turbine on Grouse Mountain is a blight to our natural landscape. I am all for sustainability and seeking steps to improve our environment and the human footprint on it. But I don’t like the looks of a wind turbine atop a mountain anymore than a powerline running down my street. So when Grouse decided to build this monstrosity that will offset 20 per cent of their energy, I figured, like many, that this has to be about more than just alternate power. The location certainly draws attention to the mountain and will no doubt increase tourism (the turbine itself has an observation deck). Perhaps this will offset the extra energy used to run more visitors up the mountain. Grouse is a business venture that needs to look at ways to increase its profit margin. Alternative energy sources are a popular way to keep people on your side while you line your pockets.
It also intrigues me that at the same time as the turbine quickly appeared on the mountain, a firestorm has continued about billboards being erected by the Squamish Nation. The billboards are also a visual smear on our landscape. But I wonder if the LED billboards were run on solar panels to offset their energy use, would the controversy end? After all, the wind turbine was overlooked for its mark on the mountain because it is good for the environment.
When you break it all down to the bottom line, both are about money. One is a business, another a government; both exerting their right to raise money for those they serve. Each only benefits itself. One is not accepted because it doesn’t look good but the other is accepted (regardless of look) because it is an alternative energy source that reduces energy dependence (solely for the business).
I think there is far more to this story than what lies on the surface discussion. In the end, it is about a double standard.
Grouse Mountain and the Squamish Nation both followed the proper channels to seek permission to erect their visual distractions from the governing bodies that must grant them permission. Both held meetings with their constituents to get feedback and support. Both stand to make good money. Only one is criticized. Double standard.
Our MPs have come out to criticize the Squamish Nation for not seeking opportunities “that are more consistent with North Shore residents’ vision for the community.” Did Grouse approach Vancouver residents over their visual distraction? How about North Burnaby? West Vancouver residents? No, they went to the community where the laws, permits, and support were needed.
The Squamish Nation did the same. Double standard.
Andrew Van Eden
West Vancouver
North Shore News
4 November 2009
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy
Some possibly related stories:
The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.
