Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Farmers eye change in wind contracts

SALEM — As a series of South Dakota Farmers Union meetings approaches its end, John Kerstiens says he’s hearing a good deal from landowners in favor of removing a confidentiality clause in wind-farm contracts that prevents neighbors from comparing offers.

“I’ve been trying to figure out if landowners want that or if they’d rather have that kept private,” said Kerstiens, SDFU legislative director. “For the most part, people really want those transparencies in those contracts just so they don’t feel like they’re getting the short end of the stick.”

Since late May, the SDFU has held 17 meetings across the state in order to hear producers’ suggestions and concerns about wind energy and other projects meaningful to the organization. Three more are scheduled to take place in July.

Tuesday, 21 people — the strongest attendance so far — gathered in Salem to talk with Kerstiens about the wind industry.

To Kerstiens, wind development in South Dakota seems “pretty slow” compared to neighboring states.

According to the American Wind Energy Association, North Dakota was home to 714 wind turbines as of March 31, almost 500 more than South Dakota’s 238.

“North Dakota … has relatively the same population over the same land mass (and) they’re kind of whipping us in wind production for what they’ve got already,” Kerstiens said.

In addition to emulating their progress, South Dakota could also follow its northern neighbors’ lead and eliminate the confidentiality clause that many landowners are against, Kerstiens said.

Kerstiens said he is encouraged by the number of landowners forming what he calls “wind communities.”

By forming a group, landowners can not only ensure a fair price for all but save money in legal fees, he said.

“It may be very expensive to get one lawyer to look through those contracts, which can be a couple of inches thick,” Kerstiens said. “I think you’ll se a lot more of these smaller wind associations forming.

Wind associations currently exist near Winner, Avon, Tyndall and Eagle Butte, Kerstiens said.

Kerstiens has also encouraged attendees to enroll in the SDFU carbon-credit program, which financially rewards enrollees who practice environmentally sound land management.

The deadline for enrollment in the program is Wednesday.

By Austin Kaus

The Daily Republic

10 July 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts